Sherritt International Corporation - MOA Nickel
2024  ESG Scorecard
Published on  August 6, 2025
Sherritt International Corporation
Disclaimer and Forward Looking Statements
Company Profile
Organizational Profile
Name Sherritt International Corporation
Describe nature of activities, brands, products and services Sherritt is a world leader in using hydrometallurgical processes to mine and refine nickel and cobalt – metals deemed critical for the energy transition. Sherritt’s Moa Joint Venture has an estimated mine life of approximately 25 years and is advancing an expansion program focused on increasing annual mixed sulphide precipitate production by 20% of contained nickel and cobalt. The Corporation’s Power division, through its ownership in Energas S.A., is the largest independent energy producer in Cuba with installed electrical generating capacity of 506 MW, representing approximately 10% of the national electrical generating capacity in Cuba. The Energas facilities are comprised of two combined cycle plants that produce low-cost electricity from one of the lowest carbon emitting sources of power in Cuba. Sherritt’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “S”.
Link to Corporate Website https://www.sherritt.com/English/Home/default.aspx
Industry Classification NAICS:
21 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction
22 Utilities
31-33 Manufacturing
54 Professional, scientific and technical services
Market Capitalization $0-$100Million USD
Type of Operations Primarily production oriented
Company Headquarters Toronto, Canada
Environment
Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Moa Nickel
Scope 1
Fuel related methane (CH₄)  (tonnes) 19.391
Fuel related nitrous oxide (N₂O)  (tonnes) 3.877
Carbon dioxide (CO₂) (tonnes CO₂-e) 561,693.151
Methane (CH₄)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 484.775
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 1,155.346
Hydrofluorocarbon-23 (CHF₃)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 0.000
Hydrofluorocarbon-32 (CH₂F₂)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 0.000
Sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 0.000
Nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 0.000
Perfluoro methane (CF₄)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 0.000
Perfluoro ethane (C₂F₆)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 0.000
Perfluoro butane (C₄F₁₀)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 0.000
Perfluoro hexane (C₆F₁₄)  (tonnes CO₂-e) 0.000
The total amount of gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonnes) 563,333.272
Discuss any change in its Scope 1 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) Moa Nickel's 2024 Scope 1 emissions remained within historical range. There were no material changes in activities or operations from previous years.
The entity may discuss the calculation methodology for its emissions disclosure, such as if data are from continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS), engineering calculations, or mass balance calculations Scope 1 emissions are calculated by means of engineering calculations using fuel and raw material consumption.
Scope 2
If company specific calculations are not available, provide information following the gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions approach:
Does the company purchase externally supplied energy (grid electricity) Yes
Report the total electricity purchased from external suppliers for the reporting year in gigajoules (GJ) 257,720.000
In what jurisdiction is the source of energy (utility) located Cuba
Conversion factor (see Guidance):
 0.800
Total amount of Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity (CO₂-e) (tonnes) 57,271.157
Does the company purchase externally supplied heat No
Does the company purchase externally supplied steam No
Does the company purchase externally supplied cooling No
The total amount of gross location based global Scope 2 GHG emissions (tonnes CO₂-e) 57,271.157
Discuss any change in its Scope 2 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) Moa Nickel's 2024 Scope 2 emissions remained within historical range. There were no material changes in activities or operations from previous years.
Air Emissions - Moa Nickel
Emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere - carbon monoxide, reported as CO (tonnes) 0.000
Emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere - oxides of nitrogen (NOx), reported as NOx (tonnes) 1,348.000
Emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere - oxides of sulphur (SOx), reported as SOx (tonnes) 14,355.000
Emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere - Particulate Matter 10 micrometres or less in diameter (PM₁₀), reported as PM₁₀  (tonnes)
 0.000
Emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere - lead and lead compounds, reported as Pb (tonnes) 0.000
Emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere - mercury and mercury compounds, reported as Hg (tonnes) 0.000
Emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere - non-methane Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)  (tonnes) 0.000
Energy - Moa Nickel
Energy Consumption
Total energy consumption within the organization (gigajoules, GJ) 9,432,420.000
Report the energy owned and controlled by the organization consumed in gigajoules for the following 9,432,420.000
Electricity purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) 257,720.000
Heating purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) 7,069,000.000
Cooling purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) 0.000
Steam purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) 2,105,700.000
Renewable fuel consumed (gigajoules, GJ) 0.000
Report energy owned and controlled by the organization sold in gigajoules and report the totals for each 0.000
Electricity sold  (gigajoules, GJ) 0.000
Heating sold (gigajoules, GJ) 0.000
Cooling sold  (gigajoules, GJ) 0.000
Steam sold (gigajoules, GJ) 0.000
Energy Management - Moa Nickel
Total energy consumed in aggregate, in gigajoules (GJ) (hydrocarbons and electricity) including the fuel types used (e.g., biomass, hydro-electric power or bioenergy) 9,432,420.000
Percentage energy consumed that was supplied by grid electricity 2.7323%
Percentage of energy consumed that was renewable energy (does not include purchased grid-mix) 0.0028%
Water - Moa Nickel
Reuse and recycle
Total volume of water that has been used in an operational task and is recovered and used again in an operational task, either without treatment (reuse) or with treatment (recycle) (megalitres) 5,271.000
Water Management
Disclose the amount of fresh water that was consumed in its operations (in thousands of cubic meters) 15,700.000
Analyse and list all operations for water risks and identify activities that withdraw and consume water in locations with High (40–80%) or Extremely High (>80%) Baseline Water Stress as classified by the World Resources Institute’s (WRI) Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct Does not apply. Operations do not interact with water bodies classified as being in High or Extremely High Water Stress locations as defined by the WRI Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct.
Disclose the fresh water withdrawn in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water withdrawn Does Not Apply
Disclose water withdrawn in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress (in thousands of cubic meters) 0.000
Disclose fresh water consumed in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water consumed 0.0000%
Total water consumed in locations with high or extremely high baseline water stress (in thousands of cubic meters) 0.000
Was your organization subject to any fines, enforcement orders, and/or other penalties for water-related regulatory violations No
Total number of incidents of non-compliance associated with water quality permits, standards, and regulations, including violations of a technology-based standard and exceedances of quality-based standards (note: only those that resulted in a formal enforcement
action(s))		 0
Total number of violations - continuous discharges, limitations, standards, and prohibitions that are generally expressed as maximum daily, weekly average, and monthly average (regardless of their measurement methodology or frequency) 0
Total number of violations - non-continuous discharges and limitations that are generally expressed in terms of frequency, total mass, maximum rate of discharge, and mass or concentration of specified pollutants (regardless of their measurement methodology or frequency) 0
Total number of violations - other, please specify 0
Water and Effluents - Moa Nickel
Water Withdrawal by Segment
Total water withdrawn by segment, in megalitres (ML) 16,136.000
Surface water (total in ML) 15,700.000
Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 15,700.000
Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Groundwater (total in ML) 0.000
Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Seawater (total in ML) 0.000
Produced water (total in ML)
 0.000
Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Third-party water (total in ML)
 436.000
Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 436.000
Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Report on the total water withdrawal from all areas with water stress in megalitres (ML), and a breakdown of this total by the following sources 0.000
Surface water (total in ML)
 0.000
Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Groundwater (total in ML) 0.000
Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Seawater (total in ML) 0.000
Water Consumption
Report the total water consumption from all areas in megalitres 15,700.000
Report the total water consumption from all areas with water stress in megalitres 0.000
Water Discharge
Report the total water discharge to all areas (in megalitres) 0.000
Surface water 0.000
Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Groundwater
 0.000
Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) 0.000
Seawater 0.000
Waste - Moa Nickel
Waste Generation and Significant Waste-Related Impacts
Report the total amounts of waste generated of the following and associated risks (tonnes) 4,775,332.000
Overburden amount (tonnes) 1,305,614.000
Rock amount (tonnes) 340,219.000
Tailings amount (tonnes) 3,129,499.000
Waste Generated
Report the total weight of waste generated (tonnes) 1,711.000
Total waste composition breakdown - Organization's own activities (tonnes) 1,711.000
Type of waste
Hazardous waste (tonnes) 1,341.000
Non-Hazardous waste (tonnes) 370.000
Waste Diverted from Disposal
Total weight of waste diverted from disposal (tonnes) 370
Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonnes), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations 0
Preparation for reuse (total, tonnes) 0
Preparation for reuse - Onsite 0
Preparation for reuse - Offsite 0
Recycling (total, tonnes) 0
Recycling - Onsite 0
Recycling - Offsite 0
Other recovery operations (total, tonnes) 0
Other recovery operations - Onsite 0
Other recovery operations - Offsite 0
Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonnes), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations 370
Preparation for reuse (total, tonnes) 0
Preparation for reuse - Onsite 0
Preparation for reuse - Offsite 0
Recycling (total, tonnes) 370
Recycling - Onsite 0
Recycling - Offsite 370
Other recovery operations (total, tonnes) 0
Other recovery operations - Onsite 0
Other recovery operations - Offsite 0
Waste Directed to Disposal
Report the total weight of waste directed to disposal (tonnes) 1,341
Total weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal (tonnes), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations 1,341
Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonnes) 0
Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite 0
Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite 0
Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonnes) 0
Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite 0
Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite 0
Landfilling (total, tonnes) 1,341
Landfilling - Onsite 0
Landfilling - Offsite 1,341
Other recovery operations (total, tonnes) 0
Other recovery operations - Onsite 0
Other recovery operations - Offsite 0
Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste directed to disposal (tonnes), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations 0
Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonnes) 0
Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite 0
Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite 0
Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonnes) 0
Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite 0
Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite 0
Landfilling (total, tonnes) 0
Landfilling - Onsite 0
Landfilling - Offsite 0
Other disposal operations (total, tonnes) 0
Other disposal operations - Onsite 0
Other disposal operations - Offsite 0
Waste Management - Moa Nickel
Disclose the total weight of tailings produced (tonnes) 3,129,499.000
Disclose the total amount of waste rock generated (tonnes) 340,219.000
Disclose the total amount of overburden removed (tonnes) 1,305,614.000
Tailings Storage Facilities Management
Does your company manage Tailings Storage Facilities Yes
Provide an inventory of all tailings storage facilities (TSFs):
TSF #1: (1) Facility name Acid Leach Tailings Facitlity
TSF #1: (2) Location Cuba
TSF #1: (3) Ownership status Moa Joint Venture
TSF #1: (4) Operational status Care and maintenance
TSF #1: (5) Construction method upstream
TSF #1: (6) Maximum permitted storage capacity (tonnes) 53,700,000.000
TSF #1: (7) Current amount of tailings stored (tonnes) 53,700,000.000
TSF #1: (8) Consequence classification Significant
TSF #1: (9) Date of most recent independent technical review 2024-12-05
TSF #1: (12) Site-specific EPRP Yes
TSF #2: (1) Facility name North Extension
TSF #2: (2) Location Cuba
TSF #2: (3) Ownership status Moa Joint Venture
TSF #2: (4) Operational status Care and maintenance
TSF #2: (5) Construction method upstream
TSF #2: (6) Maximum permitted storage capacity (tonnes) 13,070,137.000
TSF #2: (7) Current amount of tailings stored (tonnes) 13,070,137.000
TSF #2: (8) Consequence classification Significant
TSF #2: (9) Date of most recent independent technical review 2024-12-05
TSF #2: (12) Site-specific EPRP Yes
TSF #3: (1) Facility name Area 22
TSF #3: (2) Location Cuba
TSF #3: (3) Ownership status Moa Joint Venture
TSF #3: (4) Operational status Operating
TSF #3: (5) Construction method centreline
TSF #3: (6) Maximum permitted storage capacity (tonnes) 19,185,127.000
TSF #3: (7) Current amount of tailings stored (tonnes) 12,779,729.000
TSF #3: (8) Consequence classification Significant
TSF #3: (9) Date of most recent independent technical review 2024-12-05
TSF #3: (12) Site-specific EPRP Yes
Provide a summary of the tailings management systems used to monitor and maintain the structural integrity of tailings facilities and to minimize the risk of a catastrophic failure Piezometer readings, settlement monuments, and other technologies are used to monitor tailings dams, abutments, natural slopes and water levels.
Provide summary of tailings management systems and governance structure used to monitor and maintain the stability of tailings storage facilities The tailings management systems and governance structure used to monitor and maintain the stability of tailings storage facilities are summarized in Sherritt's 2024 Tailings Management Report. Each TSF is monitored regularly by the tailings management teams and Engineer of Record for safety and stability. Instrumentation such as piezometers and settlement monuments are reviewed as part of those assessments.
Disclose the approach to the development of Emergency Preparedness and Response Plans (EPRPs) Emergency Preparedness and Response Plans (EPRPs) are developed along with the Operations Maintenance and Surveillance (OMS) manual every two years or when a major facility change occurs. EPRPs are prepared by the Engineer on Record and the Tailings Dam Team. The initial draft is sent for peer revision and the final version is sent to Moa Nickel Directors and Sub-Directors for revision and commentaries. Finally, this document is sent to local authorities for approval.

The EPRP is currently being updating by GEOCUBA and Moa Nickel. The update includes the fourth stage of A22. The surrounding population will be informed and trained on the new actions. In addition, a new alarm system will be installed in the future.
Disclose the company's approach to engagement concerning  Emergency Preparedness and Response Plans (EPRPs) at tailings storage facilities, including the preparedness of local stakeholders EPRPs and the OMS are designed to account for the close proximity between the tailings facilities and the surrounding community of La Veguita. Two major safety campaigns are implemented annually to engage the local population and warn them of the potential risk of living near tailings facilities. Tailings dam personnel are also trained in these areas throughout the year and during their safety inductions and training.
Biodiversity - Moa Nickel
Impacts
Amount of land (owned or leased, and managed for production activities or extractive use) disturbed or rehabilitated (hectares):
Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (A: opening balance) 923.590
Total amount of land newly disturbed within the reporting period (B) 58.750
Total amount of land newly rehabilitated within the reporting period to the agreed end use (C) 40.000
Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (D= A+B-C; closing balance) 942.340
Social
Scale of the Organization - Moa Nickel
Direct Employee Information
Total number of permanent employees (full-time & part-time) 8
Permanent employees - Male 8
Permanent employees - Female 0
Total number of temporary employees (full-time & part-time) 4
Temporary employees - Male 4
Temporary employees - Female 0
Total number of direct employees (includes full-time permanent, part-time permanent, temporary; exclude workers who are not employees) 12
Direct employees - Male 12
Direct employees - Female 0
Workers Who are Not Employees
Total number of workers who are not employees - Male (full-time, part-time) 2,008
Total number of workers who are not employees - Female (full-time, part-time) 190
Total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organization (e.g., suppliers, customers, or other business partners, such as in joint
ventures)		 2,198
The Cuban workforce is supplied by two state employment contractors. All contractors are under Sherritt and its partners' duty of care, but Cuban nationals are not hired directly by Sherritt.
Total Workforce
Total workforce (includes direct employees and workers who are not employees) 2,210
Total female workforce 190
Female workforce as percentage of total employed workforce 8.5973%
Total male workforce 2,020
Male workforce as percentage of total employed workforce 91.4027%
Workers who are not employees (contractors) as percentage of total employed workforce 99.4570%
Employment - Moa Nickel
Turnover & Gender Breakdown
Female direct employees:
Total number of turnover (the number of females that left during the period) 0
Male direct employees:
Total number of turnover (the number of males that left during the period) 1
Report the total number and rate of turnover for all Direct Employees:
Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) 1
Voluntary Turnover - direct employees:
Total number of turnover (the number that left voluntarily during the period) 0
Involuntary Turnover - direct employees:
Total number of turnover (the number that left involuntarily during the period) 1
Turnover & Age Breakdown
Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under:
Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) 0
Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old:
Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) 0
Direct Employees over 50 years old:
Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) 1
Identify types of employees captured in the turnover rate calculations All employees on the payroll
New Hires and Rate of Hire
Total number and rate of new hires: All direct employees
Total hires during the reporting period 3
Rate of hire 25.0000%
Total number and rate of new hires: Direct Female employees
Total female hires during the reporting period 0
Females as percent of total new hires 0.0000%
Total number and rate of new hires: Direct Male employees
Total males hires during the reporting period 3
Males as percent of total new hires 100.0000%
Total number and rate of new hires: Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under
Total hires during the reporting period (30 yr. and under) 0
30 yr. and under as percent of total new hires 0.0000%
Total number and rate of new hires: Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old
Total hires during the reporting period (30-50 yrs.) 1
30-50 yrs. as percent of total new hires 33.3333%
Total number and rate of new hires: Direct Employees over 50 years old
Total hires during the reporting period (50+ yrs.) 2
 50+ yrs. as percent of total new hires 66.6667%
Occupational Health and Safety - Moa Nickel
Work-related Injuries
Injuries - direct employees:
Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury 0
Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked 0.000
Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) 0
Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) 0.000
Number of recordable work-related injuries 13
Total recordable work-related injuries rate 0.586
Number of hours worked 4,437,465
Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) 9
Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) 0.406
Fatality rate for work-related fatalities - direct employees 0.000
Number of fatalities - direct employees 0
Injuries - workers who are not employees, but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization:
Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury 0
Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked 0.000
Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) 0
Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) 0.000
Number of recordable work-related injuries 4
Total recordable work-related injuries rate 0.614
Number of hours worked 1,303,416
Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) 3
Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) 0.460
Fatality rate for work-related fatalities - workers who are not employees 0.000
Number of fatalities - workers who are not employees 0
Combined (Employees and non-employees, but controlled by the organization):
Total Hours Worked 5,740,881
Total number of all recordable work-related injuries 17
Total recordable work-related injuries rate 0.592
Total Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) 12
Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) 0.418
Fatality rate for work-related fatalities - Combined (Employees and non-employees, but controlled by the organization) 0.000
Number of fatalities - Combined (Employees and non-employees, but controlled by the organization) 0
Have rates been calculated based on 200,000 or 1,000,000 hours worked 200,000 hours worked
Were any workers excluded from this disclosure No
Child Labour - Moa Nickel
Operations and Suppliers At Risk
Are there operations or suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labour No
Forced or Compulsory Labour - Moa Nickel
Operations and Suppliers At Risk
Operations considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor either in terms of type of operation, or countries or geographic areas with operations considered at risk Does not apply.
Countries or geographic areas with operations considered at risk None
Suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor either in terms of type of supplier, or countries or geographic areas with suppliers considered at risk Does not apply.
Countries or geographic areas with suppliers considered at risk None
Measures taken by the organization in the reporting period intended to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour In 2015, Cuba ratified the International Labour Organization's Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, which calls for the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labour, including slavery, trafficking, the use of children in armed conflict, the use of a child for prostitution, pornography and illicit activities (such as drug trafficking) as well as hazardous work. Cuban legislation prohibits child labour and establishes 17 years old as the minimum age of employment. Sherritt has also established a Human Rights Policy that stipulates a strict prohibition of any use of child labour in its own operations or supply chain. In 2024, a Conflict-Affected and High Risk Area assessment was completed and follow-up due diligence assessment at Moa Nickel. There is no child labour or other high risks in Sherritt's mineral supply chain. More information is available on Sherritt's Sustainability website.
Sherritt Sustainability
Local Communities - Moa Nickel
Operations with Local Community
Have the operations included the use of the following:
Social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes No
Environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring Yes
Public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments No
Local community development programs based on local communities’ needs Yes
Stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping No
Broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups No
Works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other worker representation bodies to deal with impacts Yes
Formal local community grievance processes Yes
Significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples Does not apply.
Number of significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples 0
Description of significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples Does not apply.
The extent to which grievance mechanisms were used to resolve disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples, as well as the outcomes Does not apply.
Community Relations - Moa Nickel
Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM)
List the mine sites where ASM occurs on or in close proximity to the site None.
Report the total number and nature of incidents involving ASM and actions taken to address them 0 incidents.
Number of company operating sites where artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) takes place on, or adjacent to, the site (not controlled by company/unauthorized) 0
Percentage of company operating sites where artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) takes place on, or adjacent to, the site 0.0000%
Governance
Security Practices - Moa Nickel
Policy and Procedure Training
Report the percentage of security personnel (direct employees and workers who are not employees) who have received formal training in the organization’s human rights policies or specific procedures and their application to security 0.0000%
Do training requirements also apply to third-party organizations providing security personnel Yes
This document was prepared using
, Planet Earth's complete ESG reporting solution.